Auguste Rodin (French, 1840-1917) M?re et Fille Mourante (Mrs. Merrill and her Daughter Sally)

About Auction

Live

European Art and Old Masters

By Freeman's

Feb 22, 2022

Set Reminder 2022-02-22 12:00:00 2022-02-22 12:00:00 America/New_York Bidsquare Bidsquare : European Art and Old Masters https://www.bidsquare.com/auctions/freemans/european-art-and-old-masters-8830
Auguste Rodin’s Mère et Fille Mourante, a moving mother-and-child sculpture, leads Freeman’s February 22 European Art and Old Masters auction; the work was commissioned by Mrs. Thomas Merrill in 1908 and has remained in the family for over a century. Curated by David Weiss, Head of Sale. Freeman's info@freemansauction.com

View Full Catalog (52)

• Lot Description
  Auguste Rodin (French, 1840-1917) M?re et Fille Mourante (Mrs. Merrill and her Daughter Sally)

  Signed 'A. Rodin' on base, to the right; also with 'ALEXIS RUDIER/Fondeur Paris' foundry stamp on edge of the base verso, to the left, bronze with verdigris patina
  Height (with base): 32 1/2 in. (82.6cm)
  Base: 3 3/4 x 27 1/2 x 27 1/2 in. (9.5 x 69.8 x 69.8cm)
  Conceived in 1908-1910. Cast circa 1930s. Edition of 2 bronzes (plaster cast destroyed).

  
  
  

  Provenance

  The Artist.
  Commissionned directly from the above.
  Collection of Mr. and Mrs. Thomas Merrill, Minnesota and Virginia.
  By descent in the family.
  Private Collection, Virginia.

  
  
  Footnote:

  Literature

  Paul Gsell, "En Haut de la Colline," in L'Art et les Artistes, 1914, p. 20, illustrated (the marble, as Maternit?).

  "Le Mus?e Rodin," in L'Art et les Artistes, 1919, p. 54, illustrated (the marble, as Maternit?).

  Stanislas Lami, Dictionnaire des Sculpteurs de l'?cole Fran?aise au XIXe si?cle, Vol. 4, Librarie Ancienne Honor? Champion-?douard, Paris, 1921, p. 170 (the marble, discussed, as Maternit?).

  L?once B?n?dicte, Catalogue Sommaire des Oeuvres d'Auguste Rodin et Autres Oeuvres d'Art de la Donation Rodin, Imprimerie Beresniak, Paris, 1922, cat. no. 33 (the marble, discussed, as Maternit?).

  Georges Grappe, Catalogue du Mus?e Rodin : Essai Chronologique des Oeuvres d'Auguste Rodin, Lapina Imprimerie, Paris, 1927, p. 102 (the marble, discussed).

  Georges Grappe et al., Catalogue du Mus?e Rodin : Essaie Chronologique des Oeuvres d'Auguste Rodin, ?ditions du Mus?e Rodin, Paris, 1944, no. 376, p. 124, illustrated (the marble).

  Marcel Aubert and C?cile Goldscheider, Le Mus?e Rodin, H. Laurens ?diteur, Paris, 1956, p. 15 (the marble, discussed).

  Ludwig Goldschider, Rodin Sculpture, Phaidon, London, 1964, pl. 83, illustrated (the marble).

  Ionel Jianou and C?cile Goldscheider, Rodin, Arted, Paris, 1967, p. 113 (the marble, discussed).

  Jean-Fran?ois Chabrun and Robert Descharnes, Auguste Rodin, Edita, Lausanne, 1967, p. 218, illustrated (the marble).

  Maurice Rheims, La Sculpture au XIXe si?cle, ?ditions des Arts et M?tiers Graphiques, Paris, 1972, p. 140, illustrated (the marble).

  John L. Tancock, The Sculpture of Auguste Rodin, Philadelphia Museum of Art, Philadelphia, 1976, p. 338 (the marble, discussed).

  Peter Fusco and H.N Janson, The Romantics to Rodin, Los Angeles County Museum of Art, Los Angeles, 1980, p. 50, illustrated (the marble, as Mrs. Thomas Merrill and her Daughter).

  Josef A. Schmoll gen Eisenwerth, Rodin-Studien, Prestel-Verlag M?nchen, Munich, 1983, p. 117, illustrated (the marble).

  Rodin et la Sculpture Contemporaine : Compte-Rendu du Colloque Organis? par le Mus?e Rodin du 11 au 15 octobre 1982 au Mus?e Rodin, ?ditions du Mus?e Rodin, Paris, 1983, p. 59 (the marble, mentioned).

  Nicole Barbier, Marbres de Rodin : Collection du Mus?e, ?ditions du Mus?e Rodin, Paris, 1987, pp. 82-83 and 258, no. 3, illustrated (the marble, as Maternit?).

  H?l?ne Pinet, Rodin et ses Mod?les: Le Portrait Photographi?, an exhibition catalogue, ?ditions du Mus?e Rodin, Paris, 1990, pp. 61-65, fig. 97, illustrated p.65 (the marble).

  Monique Roland, Auguste Rodin, Profils de l'Art/Ch?nes, Paris, 1999, p. 154, no. 10 (the marble, illustrated as M?re et Fille Mourantes).

  Ruth Butler, European Sculpture of the Nineteenth Century. The Collection of the National Gallery of Art, National Gallery of Art, Washington D.C., 2000, p. 390, fig. 2, illustrated (the marble, as Mother and Her Dying Child).

  Auguste Rodin Eug?ne Carri?re, an exhibition catalogue, ?ditions du Mus?e d'Orsay and Flammarion, Paris, 2006, p. 29, 115, cat. no. 57, illustrated (the marble, twice).

  Rodin : La Fabrique du Portrait, an exhibition catalogue, ?ditions du Mus?e Rodin and Flammarion, Paris, 2009, p. 154, cat. no. 39bis, illustrated (the marble), also illustrated on the inside left cover (the marble).

  Rodin, La Chair, Le Marbre, an exhibition catalogue, ?ditions du Mus?e Rodin and Hazan, Paris, 2012, p. 98 (the marble, discussed).
  

  French Sculpture Census/R?pertoire de Sculpture Fran?aise: French Sculpture 1500-1960 in North American Public Collections (the bronze, illustrated online at: https://frenchsculpture.org/index.php/Detail/objects/26162).

  Note

  Although he never visited the United States during his lifetime, Auguste Rodin enjoyed a vast following among wealthy American collectors and patrons longing for cultural sophistication, to the eyes of whom the French sculptor represented a standard in Modern Art. As Ruth Butler states ?on both sides there was fascination and affection, though neither was burdened by deep understanding.? Having worked with many American clients in the past such as Kate Simpson or la Marquise de Choiseul (born into a prominent New York family despite the French sounding name), it was therefore no surprise for Rodin to receive a letter from Mrs. Elizabeth Merrill of Duluth, MN in February 1908.

  Well connected and deeply cultured socialites, Mrs. and Mrs. Thomas Merrill were surely among Rodin?s foremost admirers across the Atlantic. Born in 1855, Thomas D. Merrill was the son of a Michigan lumberman who, like many other lumber barons, had holdings stretching from Michigan to Washington State. While the head of his father?s mill factory, Merrill moved to Duluth, Minnesota? ?The Zenith City of the Unsalted Seas?? along with his new bride, New Yorker Elizabeth Musgrave, the widow of former Michigan Governor Charles Croswell who died in 1886, three months before the birth of their only daughter, Sally Hicks Croswell. Together, they lived "in an old-fashioned house with turrets, towers and greenhouses overlooking" the north shore of Lake Superior.

  While at first Mrs. Merrill and her husband tried to persuade Rodin to create a monument to the Chevalier Duluth, a Frenchman who gave his name to the Minnesotan town, the correspondence gradually shifted towards more personal commissions when it became clear that the first project would never be completed. Soon, Mrs. Merrill ordered two works for herself. The first one, a memorial relief based on a cast of the hand of Mrs. Merrill?s daughter, Sally, born from a first marriage to former Governor of Michigan Charles Croswell, can be seen at the National Gallery of Art in Washington, D.C. The second commission would differ in scale and meaning. As Butler explains, this project meant a great deal to Mrs. Merrill: ?She wrote to Rodin to describe exactly what she wanted her commission to be. Perhaps she had been afraid to say what she wanted face to face.?

  Mrs. Merrill requested a marble group meant ?to reproduce and to make immortal [her] resemblance and that of [her] much loved child? (?) ?in memory of the happy days? following Sally?s tragic death at 17 in 1904. Having never seen the daughter, Rodin worked from several photographs of the child that her mother had sent him, a rather new process for the artist who usually worked with models. One image in particular, showing Sally at age 6, was the main inspiration for the sculpture. ?It is this photograph of us two together, as we were then, that I would like to see reproduced (?) We both liked this image very much and always carried a copy of it anywhere we went? explained Mrs. Merrill to Rodin.

  While many patrons had criticized Rodin for his lack of concern for the resemblance between his model and his sculpture, M?re et Fille Mourante was not conceived as a realistic portrait of two figures, but as a symbol, an allegorical representation of the loving bond between a mother and her child. M?re et Fille Mourante is in fact part of the long standing tradition to possess a portrait of a loved-one as a way of remembering them, and keeping their memory alive. Rodin himself was no stranger to creating posthumous portraits, both out of public and private commissions, as shown by his famous renditions of Gustav Mahler, Honor? de Balzac, Victor Hugo and even Charles Baudelaire. The challenge for the sculptor, therefore was less about creating a faithful likeness of the person (as one would do in a death mask, for example), but more aimed at offering a vision of who the deceased was.

  Here, the small child is cradled in her mother?s embracing arms. Only the faces and the mother?s wrapping arms are visible, all shown emerging from a mass of roughly polished rock. This rest of the composition (clothes, hair, bodies) is enveloped in an indistinct, roughened, non-figurative surface. Incised in places to suggest folds in the dresses, chiseled on the bottom of the block, and irregularly polished to the left, it seems to unite the mother and the child in a fusion, a sort of whirling fog that conveys the force, and the transcendentality of maternal love. This flou artistique was very much wanted by Rodin (despite critics) who embraced this non-finito aesthetic in many of his works from 1910s, so as to show his artistic process, and to record the unfinished, transitory state ? a direct homage to Michelangelo?s haunting, and mysteriously charming sculpture (see for example his numerous examples of carved Slaves from 1520s). In this particular case, the ruggedness of the block might also be a symbol of the mourning and the longing for the deceased child, shown engulfed in the mass. Contrary to the marble version, which reveals more of the details, the bronze smoothens the surfaces into a sfumato, which strengthens the idea of contemplation and detachment. Historically, the rugged block was also analyzed as an homage Rodin paid to his dear friend, French painter Eug?ne Carri?re. The group is indeed very reminiscent of the artist?s hazy touch in his famous Tendresse, a 1905 canvas depicting a mother and her child in a loving embrace, which Rodin greatly admired and fought hard to be bought by the French state after Carri?re?s passing in 1908 (the painting is now at Mus?e d?Orsay, Paris).

  When presented with the final version in marble, Mrs. Merrill reportedly said: ?My dream of making my child immortal has finally come true.? For some unknown reason however, the marble was never sent to the Merrills and lingered in Rodin?s studio for a while. In 1916, the group became part of Auguste Rodin?s historic donation to the French Republic, which would form the basis of the creation of the Mus?e Rodin. Understandably disappointed as they had already paid for the marble group, the family had to settle on an agreement with the Museum some ten years later: while the marble group would stay in Paris, two special versions in bronze would be made for and sent to the family in the United States, along with the promise that no other reproduction or copy would ever be made (to that end, the original cast was destroyed). The present work is one of the two versions made. Sadly, Mrs. Merrill died in 1928 before having the chance to see Rodin?s monumental bronze. The sculpture has remained in the Merrill family since. First installed in the family?s Estate, Waverly Farm, in Virginia, where it remained for nearly half a century, it was then transferred to Middleburg Cemetery in the 1980s, where the Merrill descendants chose to present it as a memorial sculpture.

  The presentation of this poignant bronze at Freeman?s marks an important milestone in the work?s history, Philadelphia being a city forever associated with the French sculptor as its own Rodin Museum, opened in 1929, is the sole museum in the United States dedicated exclusively to works by the artist.

  
  
  
• Shipping Info

  • No lot may be removed from Freeman’s premises until the buyer has paid in full the purchase price therefor including Buyer’s Premium or has satisfied such terms that Freeman’s, in its sole discretion, shall require. Subject to the foregoing, all Property shall be paid for and removed by the buyer at his/ her expense within ten (10) days of sale and, if not so removed, may be sold by Freeman’s, or sent by Freeman’s to a third-party storage facility, at the sole risk and charge of the buyer(s), and Freeman’s may prohibit the buyer from participating, directly or indirectly, as a bidder or buyer in any future sale or sales. In addition to other remedies available to Freeman’s by law, Freeman’s reserves the right to impose a late charge of 1.5% per month of the total purchase price on any balance remaining ten (10) days after the day of sale. If Property is not removed by the buyer within ten (10) days, a handling charge of 2% of the total purchase price per month from the tenth day after the sale until removal by the buyer shall be payable to Freeman’s by the buyer. Freeman’s will not be responsible for any loss, damage, theft, or otherwise responsible for any goods left in Freeman’s possession after ten (10) days. If the foregoing conditions or any applicable provisions of law are not complied with, in addition to other remedies available to Freeman’s and the Consignor (including without limitation the right to hold the buyer(s) liable for the bid price) Freeman’s, at its option, may either cancel the sale, retaining as liquidated damages all payments made by the buyer(s), or resell the property. In such event, the buyer(s) shall remain liable for any deficiency in the original purchase price and will also be responsible for all costs, including warehousing, the expense of the ultimate sale, and Freeman’s commission at its regular rates together with all related and incidental charges, including legal fees. Payment is a precondition to removal. Payment shall be by cash, certified check or similar bank draft, or any other method approved by Freeman’s. Checks will not be deemed to constitute payment until cleared. Any exceptions must be made upon Freeman’s written approval of credit prior to sale. In addition, a defaulting buyer will be deemed to have granted and assigned to Freeman’s, a continuing security interest of first priority in any property or money of, or owing to such buyer in Freeman’ possession, and Freeman’s may retain and apply such property or money as collateral security for the obligations due to Freeman’s. Freeman’s shall have all of the rights accorded a secured party under the Pennsylvania Uniform Commercial Code.

• Buyer's Premium

  • Hammer Price	Premium (%)
    $0	29.00
    $600,000	23.00
    $3,000,000	15.00